CREPAC FEDERAL
FEC committee$2,512,915.522 qualifying receipts
affiliated transfer · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
WHO PAID WHO
Opening the public record…
Preparing the campaign financials.
Preparing the campaign financials.
FEC candidate H8IL06139 · 2025–2026 reporting period
See what the campaign received alongside money other groups spent to elect or defeat Sean Casten.
Received by the campaign
$2,060,473.79Spent to support this candidate
$12,097Spent to oppose this candidate
$0Separate measures, not an additive total. Campaign: reported through jun 30, 2026. Outside spending: processed periodic filings retrieved Sep 23, 2026; recent 24/48-hour notices may not yet appear. Amounts are net reported spending; negative amounts reflect reported adjustments.
No positive amounts matched in these processed filings.
Select a group to inspect its spending. The map shows up to four leading spenders per position; the full list is below. Connections show the reported position, not money paid to the candidate.
| Spender | Supports | Opposes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $12,087 | $0 | FEC records |
| SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION | $10 | $0 | FEC records |
Large disclosed receipts can connect an outside spender to another organization. Some trails end at a nonprofit whose original donors may not be identifiable from these records.
1 outside spender with qualifying organization receipts.
affiliated transfer · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
Outside spending is not automatically dark money. A Super PAC must disclose reportable donors, but a named donor may itself receive funds from undisclosed sources. Public filings cannot always identify the original person or organization behind the money.
We show documented receipts and independently matched nonprofit identities. We do not assign an outside group’s incoming money to a particular candidate or calculate a hidden-money total. Groups can fund multiple races, retain funds, or use receipts for other purposes. Original donors: not determined.
Read the matching rules and disclosure limits ↗2025–2026 receipts · Retrieved Sep 23, 2026. Source coverage and transaction categories can differ from outside-spending totals.
A personal check can come from an executive, a nurse, or a retiree. Employer and occupation disclosures add context to the individual-donation category.
These are individuals’ personal donations. An employer name does not mean the company paid, directed, or endorsed the contribution. Occupations are reported text, not a verified executive or lobbyist registry.
As reported by individual contributors
| Reported employer | Amount |
|---|---|
| SELF-EMPLOYED | $63,191 |
| CME GROUP | $11,600 |
| INTERCAPITAL PARTNERS LLC | $7,100 |
| NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY | $7,050 |
| AMG | $7,000 |
| CAPITAL GROUP. | $7,000 |
| COILCRAFT INC. | $7,000 |
| COMPUTER AIDED TECHNOLOGY | $7,000 |
| CREATIVE WERKS LLC | $7,000 |
| DUPAGE MEDICAL GROUP | $7,000 |
| Other reported values | $415,453 |
| Missing / not provided | $599,257 |
As reported by individual contributors
| Reported occupation | Amount |
|---|---|
| NOT-EMPLOYED | $490,895 |
| RETIRED | $89,172 |
| ATTORNEY | $81,697 |
| REAL ESTATE BROKER | $46,500 |
| CEO | $25,305 |
| EXECUTIVE | $24,145 |
| PHYSICIAN | $23,594 |
| PRESIDENT | $21,000 |
| NOT EMPLOYED | $19,940 |
| PRINCIPAL | $11,890 |
| Other reported values | $310,513 |
| Missing / not provided | $1,000 |
Top reported values in the included itemized records; spelling variants can appear separately. These are two views of the same money and must not be added together. Positive entries: $1,161,185; negative adjustments: -$15,534. Unitemized donations have no employer or occupation breakdown here. Read coverage and exclusions ↗
FEC snapshot retrieved Sep 23, 2026 · Source archive last updated Sep 20, 2026. 1 campaign committee linked by FEC ID. Methodology ↗
Accountability coverage for Sean Casten. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2026 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
Campaign respondent: CASTEN FOR CONGRESS C00648493 ↗
Matched by complete committee name, verified against the case respondent list. The legal index itself does not supply candidate IDs.Respondents: Scheffki, Michelle M.; SunshinePac; Casten for Congress; Hennelly, John; Casten, Tom; Garton, Michael
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
Source retrieved Sep 15, 2026. This index does not review later litigation, reopening, or enforcement of the agreement.
This is a coverage gap, not a finding about their conduct. The same source standards apply to every candidate.
All incoming funds, including transfers
Disbursements, including transfers
At the end of the reporting period
Outstanding reported obligations
Unitemized is a disclosure category, not a count of small donors.
Contributions exclude loans, transfers, and other receipts. Committee contributions include PACs and other political committees. See definitions ↗
These categories help explain why total receipts differ from contributions.
Receipts and spending can include money moved between a candidate’s own committees. Refunds are listed separately; contributions above are gross reported amounts.
The latest matching record from each of up to 12 committees, ordered by transaction date. Each amount is a single reported transaction, not that committee’s total giving. Filings may include amendments, memo entries, and negative adjustments.
Source: FEC committee-to-candidate files, downloaded Sep 15, 2026. Reporting committee names come from the committee registry. These records exclude independent expenditures and do not reconcile to candidate-reported receipts. Selection methodology ↗